June 2018
Critiques
by Sara Stevens
Design and capital in the work of Gerald Hines.
by Vittorio Lovato with Peggy Deamer, Quilian Riano, and Manuel Shvartzberg on behalf of The Architecture Lobby
Mapping prize funding for research in architecture.
Leah Meisterlin in conversation with Samantha Parsons from UnKoch My Campus
On expelling undue influence.
By Eric Wycoff Rogers
The National Municipal League and the rise of architectural expertise.
by Masha Panteleyeva
A Soviet guide to funding transparency.
by Richard L. Hindle
A history of innovation in physical infrastructure and large-scale complex systems.
By Frédéric Schnee
Nicolas Schöffer’s Maison Spatiodynamique à Cloisons Invisibles.
Projects
An interview with Sweet Water Foundation’s Emmanuel Pratt
How funding shapes work. How work shapes funding.
Dong-Ping Wong in conversation with Archie Lee Coates
Staying afloat with + POOL.
by Jonathan Tate and Travis Bost
Retaining value and reimagining idiosyncrasy where two markets meet.
by Skylar Bisom-Rapp
Escaping the false binary between public and private property regimes.
by Joseph Dahmen and Amber Frid-Jimenez of AFJD
Mycelium architecture and ecologies of practice.
by Common Room
A statement on conducting conflict.
by Stephen Zacks
The use of influence for advocacy and production.
LABORATORY SERIES. No.11. Memo from the Assistant Secretary of Health to the Director of the Center of Disease Control ordering the termination of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1972. Conducted by the US Public Health Service and Tuskegee Institute starting in 1932, the study tracked untreated syphilis in 600 African American males. Without informed consent and under the guise of being treated for “Bad Blood,” the subjects were given free medical exams, meals and burial insurance. No patient was aware of having syphilis, and no patient was given treatment for the disease. The experiment led to the establishment of the Office for Human Research Protections. Photo Source: Wikipedia.
